Sean
Penn--the Ed Wood of writingBy
Rick Bishop
December
15, 2008--I suppose I should say that I respect Oscar-winner and macho
man Sean Penn's acting ability, though I think his taste in scripts mostly
stinks. I did like the one with Al Pacino where Macho Man played a
curly-haired, coke-sniffing lawyer and the one with Timothy Hutton where
he played a straight-haired, coke-sniffing loser who trades government
secrets to the Russians. Oh, and then there's Mystic River.
He was great in that. I also liked him in Dead Man Walking,
but Susan Sarandon--playing a nun, of all things--ruined it for me.
She usually does. Same as her celebritician husband, Tim Robbins,
though I liked him in Bob Roberts.
I also admire Macho Man for being the first
to tap Madonna, or maybe I
should say the first famous person to tap her. I doubt that
she was a virgin when he got hold of her, and she still had those big,
bushy mustaches masquerading as eyebrows back then. Still, Macho Man
can always say he was the first, and who's going to argue with him?
Less
admirable but still entertaining to watch has been Macho Man's penchant
for bullying paparazzi. Wouldn't it be funny if one of these geeky
photogs delivered a De Niro-style, on-the-pavement shit kicking to Macho
Man? It could happen. He's not as young as he used to be.
We can only hope.
It's no secret that in addition to being a
world-class actor and bully, Macho Man has for years used his celebrity as
a built-in platform to air his leftist opinions, a la Rosie O'Donnell,
Michael Moore, George Clooney, and the aforementioned Susan Sarandon and
Tim Robbins. It's easy enough to dismiss this buffoonish behavior.
It's just celebritics as usual. Mostly these
out-of-touch-with-reality celebriticians are bores. No one really
listens to them. Does anyone with half a brain really care what they
think about world events? But Macho Man has finally gone too far.
He now thinks he's a journalist, and he's getting away with it. He's
now being encouraged by the folks at Huffington Post, Time, the
San Francisco Chronicle, and The Nation.
I hadn't been aware of this until recently
when I read an article in reasononline, aptly entitled
"Dumb Man Talking," exposing Macho Man's
misadventures in Venezuela and Cuba with Hugo Chavez and Raul Castro.
(Be sure to follow the link to The Nation contributing editor
Marc Cooper's personal blog, where he calls Macho Man's story, among other things, "horribly
embarrassing.") Unable to help
myself, I followed the link to this piece (of shit), imaginatively entitled
"Conversations with Chavez and Castro," at TheNation.com.
I won't go into the content, what bad "journalism" it is--you can
see for yourself --but the
writing, sentence by sentence, is some of the worst I've seen
anywhere. The adapted and, mercifully, edited version appearing in
The Nation made me laugh out loud. Then I had to go to the
Huffington Post to read the
unedited version, in two parts, no less, entitled
"Mountain of
Snakes." Oh my God! I had to post a comment, which the
Huffington "moderators" (actually censors) promptly rejected, but it went something like
this:
This is the worst piece of
crap I've ever read. An average English composition student could have
done much better. Hey, Sean, regarding commas: "When in doubt, leave
them out." Did anyone at The Post read it before you put
it out there? What about editing? Proofreading? You're a hell of an actor, and you should stick to it.
This "piece" is the equivalent of a "B" movie--poorly done and
unintentionally funny. You should have called it "Mountain of . . ."
well, you can guess the rest.